Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:00

Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Study finds creature that may hold the key to bring limb regeneration to humans - WKRC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What are some great short jokes?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Investopedia
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Monday Leaderboard: Keegan Bradley has a Ryder Cup conundrum of his own making - Yahoo Sports
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Friday the 13th solar storm could bring auroras to 18 US states this weekend - Live Science
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why do people believe that global warming is man made?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.